|
Asthma Specialists JEFFREY TULIN-SILVER, M.D. ~ SUCHETHA KINHAL, M.D. BOARD CERTIFIED ADULT & PEDIATRIC ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY www.michiganfoodallergy.net Comprehensive Food Allergy Clinic of West Bloomfield
(Adapted from Consumer Reports, May 2005) Ads for air cleaners from Sharper Image and Oreck include a Seal of Truth from the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of American (AAFA). Sharper Image ads also display a Seal of Approval from the British Allergy Foundation, now known as Allergy UK. What the seals don't tell you. The AAFA's Seal of Truth program is open to manufacturers who submit a $5,000 application fee. According to the AAFA, companies are asked to submit "independent" research for review by a panel of experts, who determine whether a product's performance meets its claims. If a panel says it does, manufacturers can apply the seal to that product for two years. The AAFA states on its Web site that its expert panel includes M.D.'s, Ph.D.'s, and Masters of Public Health. Michael Tringale, an AAFA spokesman, would not identify its experts, citing confidentiality concerns. Nor would Tringale or Sharper Image show us research submitted as part of the seal program. But the AAFA's literature disclosed two points that the air cleaner ads don't mention. One is that its seal is not an endorsement or statement of clinical efficacy. Yet the words on the seal for Sharper Image's Ionic Breeze imply otherwise. Allergy UK's Seal of Approval program is somewhat like the AAFA's, though it says its seal is an endorsement. A manufacturer submits a fee for new testing by an "independent scientific consultant" at the University College Worcester or a review of its own independent tests. According to the British group, a 39 member panel of experts sets specific protocols for each product. Allergy UK would not disclose detailed information about its review protocol. What's more, the foundation states on his Web site that its endorsement does not mean that a product will necessarily reduce an allergy sufferer's symptoms. What the studies don't say. Studies touted in Sharper Image ads came under scrutiny last year in Sharper Image's lawsuit against Consumers Union. Court testimony and documents revealed information absent from the ads. For one, documents showed that a researcher had been receiving a $6,000 monthly retainer from Sharper Image for research used by the company to support the sale of its Ionic Breeze. The company also provided research grants to a university professor and author of two reports about the Ionic Breeze prepared at Sharper Image's request, and compensated others whose research was cited. In November 2004, Federal Judge Maxine Chesney dismissed Sharper Image's suit, holding that there was no reasonable probability that Consumers Unions' findings were false and that Sharper Image's studies provided no basis for challenging those findings. After months of testing and investigation by Consumer Reports researchers, the following findings were noted:
The Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the American Lung Association (ALA) recommend the following tips for improving indoor air environments:
Michigan Allergy, Sinus & Asthma Specialists
Web: www.michiganallergy.com Web: www.michiganfoodallergy.net Email: miallergy@comcast.net Please do not email confidential medical information.
|